In the 7. Bg5 Sveshnikov, I followed book moves up to 17… g6. White played 18. h4, which is the choice of Lc0. We have 22. Ra2 ( +0.39/46 ) and 22… Bh6 ( +1.20/45 ), so 22… Bh6 appears to be a mistake by Black. At about depth=42, Stockfish switches from 22… Bh6 to… Continue reading Lc0 and Stockfish vs Stockfish 15.1 depth=33
Month: April 2023
A program in C written by ChatGPT and me
I asked ChatGPT to write a program to simulate a Turing machine with a transition table given by me. The Turing machine is example no. 4 from Marxen and Buntrock’s paper on 5-state Turing machines, which is available from: https://turbotm.de/~heiner/BB/simmbP_4.html . ChatGPT produced some good code in a second or so. But it took me… Continue reading A program in C written by ChatGPT and me
Berserk 11.1 and Lc0 vs Stockfish depth =27
I had Berserk at depth about 27 play several games against Stockfish 15.1 at depth=27. The opening was a balanced one, meaning that neither side had a significant advantage out of the opening, although White was slightly better (Sveshnikov Sicilian with 7. Nd5 ). Out of the several games played, a few gave an advantage… Continue reading Berserk 11.1 and Lc0 vs Stockfish depth =27
Berserk 11.1 depth=41 vs Stockfish 15.1 depth=23
The game had various depths for Berserk. The greatest depth used was 41. In the endgame, I lowered the depth to 35, because it was taking too long for Berserk to move. The game is at the URL: https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/pgn/3ZdLqrT9b4?tab=review . Next, I’ll try Berserk 11.1 depth=43 vs Stockfish 15.1 depth=25. Berserk depth=43 won against Stockfish… Continue reading Berserk 11.1 depth=41 vs Stockfish 15.1 depth=23